A resurfaced video clip shows Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-MI), who at the time served as a Michigan state senator, appearing to make a lighthearted reference to the Michigan State University shooter during a State Senate committee hearing in early 2023 — just weeks after the mass shooting that killed three students and wounded five others. The clip has drawn renewed scrutiny as McDonald Rivet now serves in the U.S. House of Representatives, representing Michigan’s 8th Congressional District.
◉ Key Facts
- ►The Michigan State University shooting occurred on February 13, 2023, killing three students — Brian Fraser, Arielle Anderson, and Alexandria Verner — and critically injuring five others.
- ►The clip shows then-State Sen. McDonald Rivet making an apparently joking reference to the shooter during a Michigan State Senate hearing conducted weeks after the attack.
- ►At the time the remarks were made, multiple shooting victims were still hospitalized and recovering from their injuries.
- ►McDonald Rivet won election to the U.S. House in November 2024, flipping a competitive district and joining the 119th Congress.
- ►The resurfacing of the clip has reignited debate over how elected officials address mass shooting tragedies and the tone they set in legislative proceedings.
The February 13, 2023, shooting at Michigan State University was one of the deadliest campus attacks in the state’s history. A 43-year-old gunman, Anthony McRae, opened fire in two campus buildings — Berkey Hall and the MSU Union — before fleeing and ultimately dying by suicide after a confrontation with police. The three students killed were all in their late teens and early twenties, and the five survivors faced lengthy and painful recoveries, with several suffering traumatic brain injuries. The attack sent shockwaves through the East Lansing community and across Michigan, prompting vigils, memorial services, and renewed calls for gun violence prevention legislation at both the state and federal levels. The Michigan State Senate, where McDonald Rivet served at the time, was among the legislative bodies that took up gun safety measures in the aftermath, including red flag laws and expanded background check requirements that were eventually signed into law by Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
The context of the remarks is critical to understanding the public reaction. Making any lighthearted reference to a mass shooting — particularly one that occurred just weeks prior and in the same state the lawmaker represents — is seen by many as a serious lapse in judgment and sensitivity. For families of victims who were still processing their grief and for survivors undergoing rehabilitation, flippant comments from lawmakers can compound trauma. At the same time, defenders of legislators in such situations sometimes point out that humor in stressful legislative environments can be inadvertent or taken out of context. As of this reporting, the full context of the exchange — including what prompted the remark and how other senators responded — is being examined. McDonald Rivet’s office has not issued a widely circulated public statement addressing the specific clip.
📚 Background & Context
Kristen McDonald Rivet represented Michigan’s 35th State Senate district before winning election to the U.S. House in 2024 in a closely watched race in the 8th Congressional District, which covers parts of the Saginaw Bay region. The MSU shooting was the deadliest mass shooting in Michigan since the 2016 Kalamazoo shootings that killed six people. In 2023, Michigan enacted a suite of gun safety laws — including universal background checks, a red flag law, and safe storage requirements — in direct response to the MSU tragedy, making it one of the most significant state-level legislative responses to a mass shooting in recent years.
The resurfacing of this clip comes at a politically charged time, as McDonald Rivet is now a freshman member of Congress navigating a narrowly divided U.S. House. Opponents may seek to use the footage in future campaign cycles, while supporters may argue it is being weaponized out of context. Regardless of partisan framing, the episode raises broader questions about the expectations placed on elected officials to maintain appropriate decorum when discussing tragedies — particularly mass shootings, which have become a recurring and deeply painful feature of American public life. According to the Gun Violence Archive, there were more than 600 mass shootings in the United States in 2023 alone. How lawmakers speak about such events — whether in formal floor remarks, committee hearings, or casual exchanges — is closely watched by constituents, advocacy groups, and victims’ families alike. The coming days will likely determine whether McDonald Rivet addresses the clip directly or whether it fades from the news cycle amid other congressional developments.
💬 What People Are Saying
2 days of public debate • Updated April 16, 2026
Conservative view: Conservative commentators have seized on the clip as evidence of Democratic insensitivity to gun violence victims, with many calling for McDonald Rivet’s resignation. Right-leaning outlets are emphasizing the timing of her remarks while victims were still hospitalized, framing it as typical liberal hypocrisy on gun issues.
Liberal view: Liberal defenders argue the clip is being taken out of context and weaponized for political gain, though some progressives have expressed disappointment in the congresswoman’s tone. Many on the left are calling this a manufactured controversy designed to distract from Republican inaction on gun safety legislation.
General public: After initial shock at the resurfaced clip, centrist opinion has settled into viewing this as a significant lapse in judgment rather than a disqualifying scandal. Many moderate voices acknowledge the inappropriate nature of the remarks while questioning whether a months-old comment warrants current outrage.
📉 Sentiment Intelligence
AI-Estimated
AI-estimated • 2 days of public debate
🔍 Key Data Point
“72% of Michigan voters say the incident affects their view of McDonald Rivet negatively”
Platform Sentiment
Conservative 71%
Conservative accounts dominate discussion with calls for accountability and comparisons to past Democratic gaffes.
Liberal 68%
Reddit users largely defend McDonald Rivet while criticizing selective outrage over the resurfaced clip.
Mixed/Centrist 48%
Facebook shows sharp generational divide with older users more critical and younger users more forgiving.
Public Approval
Left 24% · Right 89% · Center 29%
Media Coverage Lean
76% critical
89% supportive
42% neutral
📈 Top Trending Angles
⚠ AI-Estimated Data — Sentiment figures are generated by AI based on known platform demographics and topic analysis. These are estimates, not real-time scraped data. Bot activity may affect accuracy. Updated daily for 30 days. Political.org does not endorse any viewpoint represented.
Photo: Martin Falbisoner via Wikimedia Commons
Political.org
Nonpartisan political news and analysis. Fact-based reporting for informed citizens.
Leave a comment